rtgogl.blogg.se - Best code review tools for git

#Best code review tools for git free#

That it can be stable for backport branches. Removes leading ce- and ee-, and trailing -ce and -ee, so It always picks the same reviewers and maintainers for the sameīranch name (unless their out-of-office (OOO) status changes, as in point 1).Is 🔶 :large_orange_diamond: or 🔸 :small_orange_diamond: are half as likely to be picked. Trainee maintainers with 🔵 :large_blue_circle: are four times as likely to be picked as other reviewers.Reviewers with 🔵 :large_blue_circle: are two times as likely to be picked as other reviewers.This applies to both reviewers and trainee maintainers. Is 🔵 :large_blue_circle: are more likely to be picked. Team members whose Slack or GitLab status emoji.Focus mode - 💡 :bulb: (focusing on their team’s work)Īre three times as likely to be picked as other reviewers.Out sick - 🌡️ :thermometer:, 🤒 :face_with_thermometer:.On leave - 🌴 :palm_tree:, 🏖️ :beach:, ⛱ :beach_umbrella:, 🏖 :beach_with_umbrella:, 🌞 :sun_with_face:, 🎡 :ferris_wheel:.GitLab user Busy indicator is set to True.Contains the string OOO, PTO, Parental Leave, or Friends and Family.

It doesn’t pick people whose Slack or GitLab status:.

It picks reviewers and maintainers from the list at the Recommendations and you should override it if you think someone else is a better The Danger bot randomly picks a reviewer and a maintainer forĮach area of the codebase that your merge request seems to touch. Team members’ domain expertise can be viewed on the engineering projects page or on the GitLab team page. When a suitable domain expert isn’t available, you can choose any team member to review the MR, or simply follow the Reviewer roulette recommendation. We default to assigning reviews to team members with domain expertise.

Team members working on a specific feature (for example, search) are considered domain experts for that feature.

Team members working in a specific stage/group (for example, create: source code) are considered domain experts for that area of the app they work on.

We make the following assumption with regards to automatically being considered a domain expert: yml file to be merged by an already established Domain Expert or a corresponding Engineering Manager. When self-identifying as a domain expert, it is recommended to assign the MR changing the. Team members are encouraged to self-identify asĭomain experts and add it to their team profiles. Product feature, or area of the codebase. More than one approval, the last maintainer to review and approve merges it.ĭomain experts are team members who have substantial experience with a specific technology, Getting your merge request merged also requires a maintainer. Reviewers can add their approval by approving additionally. For reviewers, we use the reviewer functionality in the sidebar.

#Best code review tools for git free#

If you need assistance with security scans or comments, feel free to include theĪpplication Security Team ( in the review.ĭepending on the areas your merge request touches, it must be approved by oneįor approvals, we use the approval functionality found in the merge request If you need some guidance (for example, it’s your first merge request), feel free to ask You can read more about the importance of involving reviewers in the section on the responsibility of the author below. If your merge request touches more than one domain (for example, Dynamic Analysis and GraphQL), ask for reviews from an expert from each domain. However, it is recommended to pick someone who is a domain expert. This is only a recommendation and the reviewer may be from a different team. The default approach is to choose a reviewer from your group or team for the first review. Implementation, and an extra pair of eyes looking for bugs, logic problems, or There is any code to review, to get a second opinion on the chosen solution and You are strongly encouraged to get your code reviewed by a Getting your merge request reviewed, approved, and merged Or a wider community member, must go through a code review process to ensure theĬode is effective, understandable, maintainable, and secure. This guide contains advice and best practices for performing code review, andĪll merge requests for GitLab CE and EE, whether written by a GitLab team member

The responsibility of the merge request author.

Performance, reliability, and availability.

Getting your merge request reviewed, approved, and merged.